top of page

How After-School Hours Can Do What the School Day Can’t

6 days ago
4 min read

Growth mindset gets taught in the classroom. It comes to life when kids get to practice it.

Most schools already teach growth mindset ideas. There are posters about the power of “resilience,” and lessons on how the brain grows like a muscle, and morning meetings where students talk about learning from mistakes. Ask a third grader about the little train that could, a classic growth mindset story, and many can tell you all about it.

But knowing about a skill and using it are two different things. The moment that matters comes when a child is tired, frustrated or behind, and has to decide whether to keep going. That moment is hard to create in a 45-minute math block with a test on Friday. After school, it can happen every day.


Knowing isn’t the same as using

Some of the strongest evidence on growth mindset makes this point. In a national experiment published in Nature, researchers led by David Yeager gave a nationally representative sample of U.S. high school students a short online growth mindset lesson that took less than an hour. It improved grades among lower-achieving students. But the effect depended on where students went to school: grades improved when the peer norms around them matched the lesson’s message.


The lesson planted a seed. The environment decided whether it grew. A growth mindset lesson is necessary, but it isn’t enough. Kids also need places where taking on a challenge is normal, effort is noticed, and getting it wrong is part of the process. Those places don’t have to be classrooms. In fact, some of the best ones aren’t.


Why after-school hours are different


After-school hours offer a training kind of environment, because the conditions are different from the school day:


  • The stakes are lower. There’s no grade attached, so a mistake is information, not a judgment.

  • The challenge is physical. Kids feel frustration in tired legs and a racing heart, and they feel the payoff of pushing through right away.

  • There’s room to retry. A failed attempt can be followed by another attempt in the same minute, not the next unit.

  • Peers become coaches. Mixed ages and team games give students chances to encourage each other.


In one DashStrom class this fall, the youngest player, a five-year-old, hadn’t learned to skip yet. Instead of moving on, the older kids paused the game and started offering pointers: try this, try it like that. She took a breath and tried again, then again, until she got it. Nobody had to give a lesson on persistence. The whole class lived it.


Practice works best when it’s designed

Not every after-school program builds these skills, and the research is clear about the difference. In a widely cited meta-analysis of after-school programs aimed at personal and social development, Joseph Durlak, Roger Weissberg and Molly Pachan found that programs using four practices, known by the acronym SAFE, improved students’ positive social behaviors, self-perceptions, connection to school, grades and test scores. Programs that did not use them showed no significant gains. The academic results matter as much as the social ones: they suggest SEL and achievement aren’t competing priorities for a school’s limited time. Done well, each supports the other:


SAFE stands for sequenced, active, focused and explicit. In practice, that looks like this:

  • Explicit: name the skill. Students say “I am strong” and know what it means before the challenge starts.

  • Active: practice it with the body, not just hear about it.

  • Focused: set aside time in every session to reflect on what happened.

  • Sequenced: build the skill week by week, with each challenge a little harder than the last.


The takeaway for school leaders: enrichment doesn’t automatically build social-emotional skills. Intentional design does.


Same language on both sides of the bell


The biggest payoff comes when what students practice after school connects to what they hear during the day. A RAND Corporation study for the Wallace Foundation followed 38 schools and out-of-school-time programs in six communities as they worked on social and emotional learning together. Partnerships went more smoothly when they shared a common definition of SEL and consistent terminology, and the sites focused on practices that reinforce each other across the school day and the out-of-school day. Simple rituals, like greeting students warmly and ending with a reflection, helped build a positive climate in both settings.


That shared language is what turns practice into a habit. If a teacher says “not yet” in the morning and a coach says “not yet” in the afternoon, a child who kept going on the field at 4:00 can recognize the same move in reading group at 10:00 the next day. The skill stops belonging to one room and starts belonging to the child. Schools with an experiential or place-based philosophy already know this from their classrooms: learning sticks when students do something with it. Well-designed after-school programming carries that philosophy into the hours after the final bell.


Questions to ask an after-school partner

If you’re choosing or reviewing enrichment programs for your school, these questions help separate activity from impact:

  • Which skills do you explicitly teach, and what words do you use for them?

  • How do students actively practice those skills in each session?

  • Where is reflection built into the session?

  • How will your language connect with what our teachers already use?

  • How do you show growth over a season?


From poster to habit


The school day plants the idea. After-school hours give students room to try it, fall short safely, and try again, until “I can’t” becomes “I can’t yet,” and then “I did.” That’s when growth mindset stops being a poster on the wall and becomes something kids carry back into class the next morning.


Sources
  1. Yeager, D. S., et al. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369. Harvard Kennedy School summary

  2. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 294–309. CASEL

  3. Schwartz, H. L., et al. (2020). Early Lessons from Schools and Out-of-School Time Programs Implementing Social and Emotional Learning. RAND Corporation for the Wallace Foundation. Wallace Foundation

Comments


bottom of page